Weblog
Friday, 06 November 2009
-
"She should have kept her legs together."
The first time I ever heard someone use this phrase in person was from someone who would occasionally sit by me at lunch. Now, to set this up, you have to imagine me as a clueless teenager who knew literally nothing about human sexuality other than what I saw on TV, which of course couldn't prepare me for awkward teenage advances. So this guy would sit by me occasionally and talk like boys his age usually do, glorifying themselves in their stories without noticing that I wasn't particularly impressed with his narcissism. My strategy quickly became to ignore him as much as possible, much like one would a troll in the forums.
One day in the midst of this, he randomly asked me "Why don't you wear dresses? You should." Um... who does this punk think he is? I thought. Is he seriously suggesting I should change the way I dress for him? "I do wear dresses - to church." (I left out the part where it was because my mom told me to.) That should be the end of it, right?
Few days later: "You should wear makeup." Oh no he didn't! "I don't want to wear makeup." I'd like to see how he'd react if I told him that. I thought that by that point he'd give up, because it was quite obvious I didn't want to be his little arm candy, but no, he stuck around for a few more lunches, telling stories to try to impress me, because he was just that clueless.
Well, he finally did say one thing that impressed me with the memory of him to this day, otherwise I probably would have forgotten him along with all the other misguided youth at my high school. As we were watching a pregnant girl walk by, he declared "she should have kept her legs together." My mind did that screechy record-needle thing. Did this very same dude who kept ragging on me for not being sexual enough, seriously just spew bigotry at someone who dared to express her sexuality? I gave him the look of death, and he gave me the "I'm just kidding!" look which was hopelessly melted beneath my gaze.
I sometimes wish I had been able to tear him to pieces with my words, but the fact is that even though I've always been able to see through the misogyny in our society, I haven't always possessed the tools to fight it that feminism provides. Still, I like to think this one simple statement motivated me to a lifetime of learning two things: "why do people behave this way?" and "what can I do as an individual to change the root of the issue?"
Mr. Lunch Jerk eventually moved on to his next target, but not before shooting out a bit of anti-gay bigotry at passing boys, backed by the self-esteemed proclamation of "I have gaydar!" Hehe, I bet you do.
Sunday, 01 November 2009
-
Encouraging Women in Atheism
Go to enough atheist websites and meetup events, and you'll notice something: there sure are a lot of men! Now people are people, don't get me wrong - atheism isn't a "male thing" or a "female thing". Making efforts to include women shouldn't be at the exclusion of making men feel welcome too. On the contrary, the more women we bring into the atheist community, the more people we'll have altogether, and the stronger the community will grow. Everyone wins!
I read a very insightful list today about how to encourage women in Linux. I encourage you to read the original, but I'm creating a similar list for atheists. This is mostly written to a male audience, but it's very applicable to women as well. Hopefully many of you will find this helpful.
Don't tell sexist jokes. Most men I know would say they don't do this. Some of them don't, but some of them only think they don't. Ask yourself: if the genders were reversed in this joke, would it still be funny? If so, then reverse the man with the woman in your joke, and then tell it - it should still be funny. If not, then you probably should scratch it off your list.
Do protest sexist jokes. If you hear a joke that doesn't pass the "gender reversal" test, call them out. Yes, people will say you're just being sensitive or a spoil-sport. They'll get over it.
Don't call people bitches. Women do overhear how you talk about other women, and it affects their involvement in the group.
Do show some respect. The cliche advice is to treat every woman as if she were your sister/mother/grandmother. Again, women do overhear - if you treat everyone with respect, man and woman, she'll have no cause to stay away.
Don't take the "keyboard" away. If a woman is trying to find her place in the group, or is asking questions or feeling confused about something, don't take over for her. Society already sends enough messages to women that they aren't competent enough to do things for themselves. By avoiding this, you'll be making a positive impact on her decision to keep getting more involved.
Do give directions and explain them clearly. This shows that she is worth your patience, and that you respect her intelligence. It will also empower her to have the tools she needs the next time around, so she'll be less likely to need anyone's help.
Don't make sexual advances. Imagine if you were to walk into a house of worship while wearing an atheist t-shirt. You'd feel like you constantly have to defend yourself at every turn. That's no way to relax and feel comfortable and accepted. Women feel the same way when men make sexual advances: they suddenly have to be on the defense at a time when they're trying to open themselves up to connecting with the community.
Do act friendly. Most men and women like to have friends of both genders. Being friendly is a great first step.
Don't complain about the lack of women in atheism. This isn't to say that you shouldn't bring the topic up. But don't complain about it: don't whine, don't lament, don't talk about how inconvenienced you are by the gender gap. Women aren't going to join as a personal favor to you. Plus, it makes the women who are already there feel like you're expecting them to meet your needs somehow, or that they're being overlooked completely.
Do encourage women in atheism. Everyone likes some encouragement now and then.
Don't stare when women arrive. They already feel a bit out of place, this only serves to solidify that feeling.
Do treat new arrivals politely. This sends the message that not only do they not stick out, but you've been expecting them!
Don't treat women stereotypically. We're just as diverse as men are in our interests and attitudes. You won't know what we're really about till you get to know us.
Do treat women as normal people.
Don't criticize too much. In a world where far too often women are told that they're less competent than men are in male-dominated fields, criticism is less likely to be appreciated at face value.
Do compliment. Don't invent things to compliment, but try to see the good things people are doing, and show that you notice them.
Don't invite only male speakers. This is a HUGE issue, one I really ought to place at the top of the list, except that it applies to only 1% of readers. When you have 9 male speakers and only 1 woman speaker (or worse, none), you're sending out the message that "Atheism is for men."
Do ask women to speak. Don't say you can't find any women - that means you're not looking hard enough. At the very least, you could find a few people from within your local community to each give a short 10-minute presentation or story. This also shows that you care about the grassroots, not just the most popular names in atheism.
Don't make your meeting hard to attend. Women are more likely in our society to be the primary caretaker of young children. This need must be addressed if you want women to feel included. The issue of child care cannot be ignored. Also, make sure you're not picking too many male-dominated locations (such as sports bars).
Do make meetings easy to attend. When in doubt, ask your members what works best for most. Be sure to vary times and places if possible, so that those who work evenings and weekends will still be able to make it to the occasional morning event.
Don't make new people feel unwelcome. They don't know what to expect, so they'll likely sit along the outside and talk very little. That can make them seem uninterested, but more likely it's shyness.
Do help new people get involved. Tell them about all the different ways they can find their niche, and guide them into it. Help them find a reason to get motivated, and the community will grow.
Don't underestimate girlfriends or wives. Don't assume that the girlfriend/wife is only coming to meetings because her man is there. She's not an accessory.
Do treat girlfriends and wives as independent people. She's here because she wants to be. She's not just a Mrs. Male Atheist. She has her own ideas and expectations, and her own desires to fit in. Respect that she's her own person by asking her questions even if her boyfriend/husband has already given his opinion on the same topic.
Thursday, 29 October 2009
-
Want a Marriage? Play by The Rules!
[Cross-posted at Atheist Nexus.]
Silly feminists! They know what we keep saying, but deep down inside what we really want is a Traditional Marriage. Unfortunately, we're too desperate/insecure to do it right. Well fret no more - here are The Rules to make him commit or get him to split.
Dating Mistake #1: Approaching Him First While there are always exceptions, the women I coach who are struggling with boyfriends who won’t commit or husbands who ignore them almost invariably made the first contact.
Quick Fix: If you talked him first or even asked him out, you can try to restore some of the feminine mystique and you forfeited as the initiator by being a bit more elusive – a little less available, a little more mysterious.
If only these poor women had realized that men are too stupid to know when they don't want to be in a relationship. They get lured in before they know what hit them, and then they're helpless to back away. The only solution is to become more confusing - that will help them figure out why they want to be with you. What about men too shy to make the first move, you ask? Don't worry about them, they're probably gay.
Dating Mistake #2: Acting overly chummy. You’ve just met the guy and you’re telling him about the back-stabber in your office, the fight you had with your sister, the details of your recent root canal.
Quick Fix: Recognize that the more you talk about yourself, the less you’ll be listening and observing whether he is right for you.
Good advice to someone who is considering a man for his marriage potential only, but what about friendships? Or even more to the point, what if you're dating someone who is already a friend, and therefor already knows this stuff? Obviously some friends do get married, and do enjoy a long life together. I will admit though: I don't think I want to hear the details of anyone's recent root canal, no matter how intimate we may be!
Dating Mistake #3: Accepting last minute dates. You need to show (not tell) men that you’re a busy woman, with lots of friends, deadlines, projects and prospects (including romantic ones). Fancy restaurants – and fancy girls – require reservations made well in advance.
Quick Fix: To make sure you’re his “Plan A” girl (not the “Plan B” girl he calls after his first choice turns him down), I recommend setting a firm cut-off limit after which you’re “busy” – period.
Just get invited to that movie you've been wanting to see? Sudden opportunity to visit the new art exhibit at the museum? Sorry ladies, but you're too busy manipulating your man into spending more money on you to relax and enjoy life.
I don't know about you, but if a person put up the image of being that busy, I'd begin to think he/she was too busy for dating me at all. Even if I did stick around, I'd ask myself "is this how it's always going to be? Absolutely no spontaneity to balance our planned activities?"
Dating Mistake #4: Jumping into a “whirlwind romance.” “Men fall in love quickly – but they also fall out of love quickly.”
Quick Fix: You need to start pacing the relationship. If he absolutely must see you every day, 24-hours-a-day, there’s this arrangement called marriage…..let him figure it out!
Those silly men, subject to the whims of their wild emotions. Good thing we women are here to remind them that the only place where seeing each other on a daily basis is allowed is within the sacred bonds of matrimony.
I understand that logic and reason must temper emotional decisions, and that everyone needs to stick to their personal boundaries, but this encourages women to view men as hormone-driven animals.
Dating Mistake #5: Wasting Time. As Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo exhort: “Don’t waste the pretty!”
Quick Fix: If you want to get married but the guy you’ve been dating for over a year still isn’t sure, set a time limit of how long you’re willing to wait then stick to it.
Remember: marriage is the only valid form of commitment, and the only point of having a relationship is to get married. Better hurry up and find a husband before you run out of pretty, cuz nobody will want you when you're old and dried up.
I have a Quick Fix for this entire set of Rules: do what works for you. Does that guy in your meetup group seem like an interesting person? Ask him out. Get a call from your new girlfriend telling you she has two tickets to the game and her best friend got the swine flu at the last minute? Go to the game and have a blast! Upset that he doesn't hear wedding bells? Maybe that 50% divorce rate has him thinking that your relationship is simply too important to not build a solid foundation first.
Maybe it's time that the media stop telling women how to manipulate their way through the "game" of dating by giving us "rules" to win the "prize" of marriage. But then, there's no money in that, now is there?
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
-
If Privilege isn't about me, then how do I react to having it?
Reminder: If you aren't the problem, then you aren't the problem. If nobody is saying, "You, John Smith, are the problem", then you are not being accused of being the problem, (and believe me, if you're being a problem, you'll be told so in no uncertain terms). If you feel the need to defend yourself as not being the problem when nobody has accused you of being the problem, it might be a good idea to ask yourself why that is. Perhaps our discussions are hitting much closer to home than you realize?
In Part 1 we discussed how privilege isn't good or bad by itself, it simply is. In Part 2 we talked about how being told we have privilege can feel like an accusation of guilt, but it's really not about us at all. So if privilege doesn't make us good or bad, and we don't need to feel good or bad about it, what are we supposed to do with it? Understand it!
The best we can understand our privilege is by reading about it and listening to what others have to say, even if we don't agree. This is active listening: as the internet forum saying goes, "lurk before you leap". You will learn far quicker and have fewer misunderstandings if you attempt to research your questions for yourself before asking questions or making statements. Example: most atheists want "in God we trust" taken off the national currency. A Christian who is willing to learn about his own religious privilege in the United States would research why we want this change. One who is not willing to learn would jump right into the conversation and accuse atheists of hating god and Christians, and even of hating America. This doesn't mean "sit down and shut up". This just means that we don't want you to accidentally put your foot in your mouth. :)
Recognize that resenting privilege is not the same as hating those who possess privilege. If that were the case, we'd all have someone to hate us for something we can't control, because very few of us are literally without any privilege whatsoever. Understand that it's okay for people without privilege to resent that fact. Most atheists resent religious privilege all the time, but very few hate Christians, Muslims, and Buddhists. Many atheists resent how believing in god is an un-written requirement for being President of the United States, but few of us hate the President for believing in god. When you see what you feel is hateful speech, stop and think if it's possible that what you might be viewing as hate towards a people group is in fact resentment towards an imbalanced system.
Understand that no two types of privilege are the same. No two forms of inequality are the same.Again to use religion, a black Christian cannot say that her experience with racial inequality qualifies her to empathize with atheists who are outcasts, although she would be very qualified to sympathize with us. In order to empathize with us, she'd have to spend time in a country where her religion is in the minority and experience how difficult life is in those conditions, or else actually become an atheist. This does not mean that sympathy is unwelcome! It simply means that saying "I've been the subject of discrimination too!" could easily sound like you're trying to invalidate their experiences or top them with your own. And since that's not what you mean at all, and since nobody wants to falsely accuse you of being insensitive, it's best that you understand how you sound before you say things that could be misunderstood.
Learn from your mistakes, accept forgiveness, and move on. If people hold your errors against you, simply say "I've apologized and I'm willing to move forward. I hope you'll be adult enough to do the same." Don't feel like you need to carry any guilt with you, because emotional baggage won't help anyone, and will only make you feel bad. On the flip side, if someone with privilege admits they were wrong, let it drop! No dragging people through the mud, that won't help progress. Think about it this way: people who are trying to make a difference make far more mistakes than people who sit at home and do nothing at all. If we all learn how to learn from our errors, it will make us stronger and more effective agents for social equality.
Question: what has been the most useful resource for helping you to understand your own privilege?
Note: As my target audience again is mostly non-religious people, in particular those on Atheist Nexus, I've mostly pulled my examples from a privilege we can all see easily: religious/Christian privilege. I don't do this to pick on religious people. I do this because privilege is very difficult to identify if its something we already possess, but almost everyone on AN lacks religious privilege.
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
-
I have Privilege? But I'm a Good Person!
Growing up, racism was something Very Bad People did (and the occasional misguided relative who would embarrass the family to no end). So when I first heard about White Privilege, I thought "but I'm not racist! I don't take advantage of minorities. I don't call them names or tell jokes about other people groups. How dare someone I don't even know accuse me of such a thing!" It's very difficult not to take the accusation of privilege personally, as if it is something we choose or are personally responsible for having.
I wasn't always a feminist. For a while, I assumed because my parents aren't sexist and my friends aren't sexist, that the system wasn't sexist. Unfortunately, once any system is set in place (from a political system to the Solar System), it takes a lot of work to change its course. This means that even if everyone in the entire world suddenly began making an effort today to treat all genders equally; they'd still be fighting against outdated laws, corporate regulations, and cultural traditions. Their good will wouldn't make them instant experts in possession of a new and improved system they've magically had the chance to cultivate through trial and error. This is why even people who do not want their privilege cannot escape having it attached to them.
I don't deny that I felt defensive when I first learned that I have privilege: white, hetero, Christian, American, middle-class privilege (obviously some of those no longer apply to me today). It was troubling to me. I felt very similar to how Ilyka Damen felt this excellent blog post about her own discovery of white privilege:"I used to have the same reaction reading blogs by people of color. I'd see something like 'white people sure suck sometimes,' and I'd be all, 'Hey! Wait! Not all of us! Not me!' Even though I probably do suck as a white person sometimes--but I mean, I'd take it too personally." [Ilyka]
"It's hard not to take it personally." [Ilyka's boyfriend]
"It's not as hard if you move yourself out of the center of everything, though. That's what I finally got through my thick skull. It's not ABOUT me, always. And even if it is about me, so what? I'm not perfect. Why shouldn't I have to take some shit once in awhile? Heaven knows I dish enough out in a day. Would it kill me to get an attitude adjustment? Would it kill me to listen to someone unlike me for five minutes?"
"But if you aren't the problem," he argued, "It sucks to be treated like you're the problem. It's like being accused of something you didn't do."
"If I'm not the problem," I explained, "then why should I get invested in identifying with the problem? If the problem is some particular batch of white people, doing or saying shit I'd never in a million years do myself, why should I feel the need to put myself in their shoes? Just because they're white and I'm white? That's stupid."
I also felt how her boyfriend felt when he investigated his own male privilege:"A lot of the guys written about on feminist blogs do things I would never do."
"Then don't identify with them. It's not about you! You stand to pee, they stand to pee, beyond that, what's the commonality?"
"That's why the argument you guys make that I like the best is that patriarchy screws men too."
"Well, it does," I agreed with him, "but I think why you like that argument so much is because then it's about you again. All's right with the universe. Man the sun, woman the earth."
"No, I've figured out that you guys don't like that, and I'm trying not to do that, I swear, but the way you express things sometimes, isn't it just making it easier for men to get defensive?"
"No," I said firmly, "What we aren't doing is taking care of them. Nurturing them. Putting their feelings first. Looking out for them, making things safe for them. We aren't making them the center. We're talking just the way we'd talk, the way we do talk, when y'all aren't around."
"And you know sometimes that gets ugly," I continued, "but the thing to do then is to remember: Everything else IS centered around y'all. Everything else--you guys got the talk radio to take care of you, the ESPN, the CNN, the New York Times, the advertising industry--you can't bask in all that adoration day in and day out and then pitch a fit because a handful of blogs on the internet don't recognize your awesomeness. Or I mean, you can pitch a fit, go right ahead, but it's not going to end with me bringing you your binky and kissing your forehead. It's going to end with my foot in your ass."
"But for a new guy--"
"For a new guy the best policy is to lurk, read, get a feel for the place, and just keep chanting: 'It's not about me. It's not about me. It is not about me.'"
I felt blamed. I felt like every finger was being pointed at me, and that it was all my fault. I suddenly felt a need to defend myself to everyone who wasn't like me, to explain to them that "I'm not like that! I care about you!" I am growing to realize that this reaction is normal, but serves no long-term purpose. Nobody is requiring me to apologize for my privilege. Nobody needs me to explain how I'm not like the others. Nobody wants anything from me other than acceptance and awareness of it. That's all.
Today's question: how did you feel when you first became aware of the privilege you have? What was your reaction when you first understood that you have an advantage in the system due to your gender/ethnic/socio-economic/religious/health/whatever caste? Maybe you were happy, sad, didn't even blink... share with us.
Read also: Part 1 and Part 3
Connect
Weblog Archives
Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save"
above and refresh the page.


True